Mean reversion cci

Commodity Channel Index

CCI = (HLC3 - SMA(HLC3)) / (0.015 * MeanDev(HLC3)). Bullish: CCI crosses above -threshold (leaving oversold). Bearish: CCI crosses below +threshold (leaving overbought).

Signal family

Mean reversion — Oscillator-based signals that fire at overbought or oversold extremes — typically fade the prevailing move.

Parameters

Name Description Default Range
period CCI period 20 5–100
threshold Threshold 100 50–200

Historical context

4,031,287 triggers on 24,246 tickers, 1988-04-08 → 2026-05-01. Universe: US large-cap (mcap ≥ $100,000,000, price ≥ $1). Long-only convention: BUY at open T+1, hold the horizon, compare to S&P 500 Equal Weight over the same window.

Methodology footnotes

Benchmarks shown in the detail tables: spxew (S&P 500 Equal Weight — primary, median-stock view, avoids the 2020+ megacap-concentration distortion), spx (S&P 500 cap-weighted, distorted post-2020), msci (MSCI World USD). Per-stock regime tags: trending = ADX(14) ≥ 25, high vol = 20d realized annualized vol ≥ 20%. 1d return = intraday T+1 open→close; 20d = open T+1 to close T+20.

At a glance — alpha vs S&P 500 Equal Weight, US-only

Holding-period sensitivity. Bullish columns: positive = signal worked (long the trigger beat the index). Bearish columns: negative = signal worked (the flagged stock underperformed).

Horizon Bullish α Bearish α
5-day -0.11% +0.03%
20-day -0.16% +0.15%
60-day +0.07% +0.47%
1-year +1.43% +2.83%

Sign flip across horizons. Bullish triggers go from -0.11% (5d) to +1.43% (1y) — short-term fade but longer holding recovers and wins.

Random-date null check (20-day): Bullish: worse than random (p=1.000).
Bearish: worse than random (p=1.000).

Where does CCI actually fire?

The bucket distribution often reveals what the signal really is, regardless of its textbook label. Heavy concentration in "non-trending + high vol" = it's mostly a chop-market event. Heavy in "trending + low vol" = it picks up the smooth grinds. Read the chart before the alpha numbers — context shapes everything that follows.

Commodity Channel Index (cci) — trigger count distribution by per-stock regime quadrant (trending/non-trending × high/low realized volatility) for , US-only universe

Does it work in every regime?

Trigger alpha split by the host stock's own regime on the trigger date — trending or ranging, high-vol or low-vol. The 20d alpha you'd actually capture if you took the trade. Bars matching your direction's "right" sign (green) = the signal worked in that regime; opposite sign = avoid it there. A signal with one strong-positive bar and three flat ones isn't a "20d alpha" signal — it's a "20d alpha when the stock is X" signal.

Commodity Channel Index (cci) — mean 20-day alpha versus S&P 500 Equal Weight by per-stock regime quadrant,  side by side
Trending + Low vol
Stock in a clean directional move with low realized volatility. Textbook "trend-following paradise" — smooth grind with little whipsaw risk.
Trending + High vol
Violent directional moves — parabolic rallies, crisis selloffs. Trend exists but the path is noisy. Signal timing may be imprecise.
Non-trending + Low vol
Quiet chop, summer doldrums, consolidations. No directional bias but also no big swings — small edges become reliable if they exist at all.
Non-trending + High vol
Choppy and violent — the classical "whipsaw zone" for momentum signals. Crossovers and breakouts fire repeatedly without follow-through.

Does it work in every era?

A multi-year average can hide major instability. The sample splits into three windows: 2015–2019 (pre-COVID), 2020–2022 (pandemic + 2022 bear), and 2023+ (post-ZIRP + AI megacap rally). All three matching your direction's "right" sign = the signal is durable. One era doing all the work = a regime-specific edge that may not repeat. The bigger the variance across eras, the smaller the position you should run.

Commodity Channel Index (cci) — 20-day alpha split by historical sub-period (2015-2019, 2020-2022, 2023+) to check consistency across market regimes

↑ Bullish triggers

Bench Metric 1d 5d 20d 60d 252d
spx Stock % +0.01% +0.16% +0.99% +2.92% +11.91%
Bench % +0.03% +0.27% +1.36% +3.35% +14.12%
Alpha % -0.04% -0.13% -0.34% -0.45% -2.27%
Median alpha -0.09% -0.36% -1.20% -2.64% -10.76%
Hit rate (α>0) 47.4% 46.1% 43.9% 42.7% 37.4%
p (naive) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
p (HAC) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
N 1,918,030 1,852,353 1,853,132 1,797,529 1,629,945
msci Stock % +0.01% +0.16% +0.99% +2.92% +11.91%
Bench % +0.07% +0.30% +1.20% +2.97% +11.74%
Alpha % -0.07% -0.15% -0.21% -0.06% -0.20%
Median alpha -0.14% -0.39% -1.08% -2.28% -8.55%
Hit rate (α>0) 46.4% 45.8% 44.5% 43.6% 39.7%
p (naive) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
p (HAC) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.0151 0.1564
N 1,905,920 1,837,883 1,825,413 1,782,977 1,606,960
spxew Stock % +0.01% +0.16% +0.99% +2.92% +11.91%
Bench % +0.06% +0.26% +1.17% +2.81% +10.29%
Alpha % -0.06% -0.11% -0.16% +0.07% +1.43%
Median alpha -0.12% -0.32% -0.97% -2.04% -6.90%
Hit rate (α>0) 47.0% 46.5% 45.1% 44.2% 41.4%
p (naive) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
p (HAC) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.0055 <0.001
N 1,907,198 1,837,656 1,824,776 1,777,851 1,604,449
Distribution of all 20d alpha outcomes for this direction. Median and winsorized mean shown.
Commodity Channel Index (cci) — bullish 20-day alpha histogram showing distribution of per-trigger returns
Observed 20d alpha (vertical line) against the null distribution of random-date firing. If the line is deep inside the null cloud, the signal adds no information. If it sits in a tail, the signal is doing real work in that direction.
Commodity Channel Index (cci) — bullish 20-day observed alpha versus random-date permutation null (200 iterations)
Permutation null detail — all horizons × both benchmarks
200-iteration null: for each ticker, sample N random dates from its history (matching observed trigger count) and compute the same alpha. Both observed and null are baseline-centered per ticker (each ticker's own baseline alpha is subtracted), so the null distribution is centered on ~0 and the comparison tests signal effect alone — not the universe-selection lift that all surviving large-caps share. pperm = one-sided fraction of null iters with mean in the "signal was right" tail (right for bullish, left for bearish).
Horizon Bench Observed lift Null mean Null 95% CI pperm
1d spx +0.09% +0.09% [+0.08%, +0.09%] 0.910
1d msci +0.08% +0.09% [+0.09%, +0.10%] 1.000
1d spxew +0.08% +0.08% [+0.08%, +0.08%] 0.910
5d spx +0.31% +0.37% [+0.36%, +0.38%] 1.000
5d msci +0.29% +0.38% [+0.37%, +0.39%] 1.000
5d spxew +0.28% +0.36% [+0.35%, +0.37%] 1.000
20d spx +1.02% +1.18% [+1.17%, +1.20%] 1.000
20d msci +1.04% +1.20% [+1.18%, +1.21%] 1.000
20d spxew +0.98% +1.15% [+1.14%, +1.17%] 1.000
60d spx +2.63% +2.53% [+2.50%, +2.56%] 0.005
60d msci +2.61% +2.55% [+2.52%, +2.58%] 0.005
60d spxew +2.41% +2.47% [+2.44%, +2.50%] 1.000
252d spx +5.30% +5.13% [+5.06%, +5.18%] 0.005
252d msci +5.13% +5.08% [+5.01%, +5.13%] 0.040
252d spxew +4.96% +4.79% [+4.72%, +4.84%] 0.005

Example triggers on US large-caps (2023+, mcap ≥ $30B)

Six recent bullish CCI triggers on US mega-caps. Top three: the signal's best outcomes. Bottom three: the worst. Catalyst-driven outliers (|α| > 25%) excluded so what's left is the signal's own typical good and bad days, not earnings shocks.

Strongest outcomes (what CCI looks like when it works)
Weakest outcomes (what CCI looks like when it fails)
Stock-regime quadrants (2×2 per-stock, 20d alpha detail table)
Each quadrant groups triggers by the stock's own ADX(14) and RV(20) at the trigger date — the textbook conditioning variable (not market-level). Stock %, bench %, alpha %, and HAC p-value shown for each benchmark.
Quadrant N Stock % (spx) Bench % (spx) Alpha % (spx) p (HAC) Stock % (msci) Bench % (msci) Alpha % (msci) p (HAC) Stock % (spxew) Bench % (spxew) Alpha % (spxew) p (HAC)
Trending + Low vol Clean directional grind, low whipsaw 141,103 +0.29% +1.08% -0.75% <0.001 +0.29% +0.93% -0.60% <0.001 +0.29% +0.85% -0.50% <0.001
Trending + High vol Crisis selloff or parabolic rally 650,882 +1.54% +1.56% -0.02% 0.2102 +1.54% +1.34% +0.14% <0.001 +1.54% +1.33% +0.16% <0.001
Non-trending + Low vol Quiet chop, summer doldrums 249,928 +0.31% +1.04% -0.71% <0.001 +0.31% +0.92% -0.58% <0.001 +0.31% +0.80% -0.46% <0.001
Non-trending + High vol Classical "whipsaw zone" for momentum 933,602 +0.93% +1.35% -0.39% <0.001 +0.93% +1.20% -0.29% <0.001 +0.93% +1.16% -0.23% <0.001
Sub-period breakdown table (20d alpha)
Historical clustering check. If alpha concentrates in one era, the signal's robustness is questionable.
Period N Alpha % (spx) p (HAC) Alpha % (msci) p (HAC) Alpha % (spxew) p (HAC)
2015-2019 2015-01-01 → 2020-01-01 601,150 -0.47% <0.001 -0.27% <0.001 -0.39% <0.001
2020-2022 2020-01-01 → 2023-01-01 589,943 -0.08% <0.001 +0.03% 0.0917 -0.38% <0.001
2023-2026 2023-01-01 → 2099-01-01 783,813 -0.44% <0.001 -0.35% <0.001 +0.21% <0.001

↓ Bearish triggers negative alpha = signal was right (stock underperformed market)

Bench Metric 1d 5d 20d 60d 252d
spx Stock % +0.01% +0.23% +0.83% +2.69% +12.75%
Bench % +0.02% +0.22% +0.93% +3.06% +13.79%
Alpha % -0.01% +0.02% -0.05% -0.35% -1.08%
Median alpha -0.07% -0.27% -1.00% -2.61% -9.77%
Hit rate (α>0) 48.2% 47.0% 44.9% 42.7% 38.2%
p (naive) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
p (HAC) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
N 1,991,110 1,926,333 1,906,751 1,868,433 1,646,663
msci Stock % +0.01% +0.23% +0.83% +2.69% +12.75%
Bench % +0.04% +0.21% +0.82% +2.65% +11.36%
Alpha % -0.03% +0.04% +0.06% +0.09% +1.29%
Median alpha -0.09% -0.26% -0.90% -2.19% -7.38%
Hit rate (α>0) 47.7% 47.2% 45.4% 43.8% 40.9%
p (naive) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
p (HAC) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.0027 <0.001
N 1,977,514 1,913,828 1,903,877 1,856,953 1,640,328
spxew Stock % +0.01% +0.23% +0.83% +2.69% +12.75%
Bench % +0.04% +0.21% +0.74% +2.28% +10.03%
Alpha % -0.04% +0.03% +0.15% +0.47% +2.83%
Median alpha -0.08% -0.25% -0.76% -1.75% -5.74%
Hit rate (α>0) 47.9% 47.3% 46.1% 45.0% 42.7%
p (naive) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
p (HAC) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
N 1,968,940 1,895,319 1,887,942 1,843,619 1,625,651
Distribution of all 20d alpha outcomes for this direction. Median and winsorized mean shown.
Commodity Channel Index (cci) — bearish 20-day alpha histogram showing distribution of per-trigger returns
Observed 20d alpha (vertical line) against the null distribution of random-date firing. If the line is deep inside the null cloud, the signal adds no information. If it sits in a tail, the signal is doing real work in that direction.
Commodity Channel Index (cci) — bearish 20-day observed alpha versus random-date permutation null (200 iterations)
Permutation null detail — all horizons × both benchmarks
200-iteration null: for each ticker, sample N random dates from its history (matching observed trigger count) and compute the same alpha. Both observed and null are baseline-centered per ticker (each ticker's own baseline alpha is subtracted), so the null distribution is centered on ~0 and the comparison tests signal effect alone — not the universe-selection lift that all surviving large-caps share. pperm = one-sided fraction of null iters with mean in the "signal was right" tail (right for bullish, left for bearish).
Horizon Bench Observed lift Null mean Null 95% CI pperm
1d spx +0.10% +0.08% [+0.08%, +0.09%] 1.000
1d msci +0.11% +0.09% [+0.08%, +0.09%] 1.000
1d spxew +0.09% +0.07% [+0.07%, +0.08%] 1.000
5d spx +0.41% +0.34% [+0.33%, +0.35%] 1.000
5d msci +0.42% +0.35% [+0.34%, +0.36%] 1.000
5d spxew +0.38% +0.33% [+0.32%, +0.33%] 1.000
20d spx +1.13% +1.09% [+1.07%, +1.11%] 1.000
20d msci +1.13% +1.10% [+1.09%, +1.12%] 1.000
20d spxew +1.10% +1.06% [+1.04%, +1.08%] 1.000
60d spx +2.21% +2.37% [+2.34%, +2.40%] 0.005
60d msci +2.23% +2.39% [+2.36%, +2.42%] 0.005
60d spxew +2.28% +2.30% [+2.27%, +2.33%] 0.055
252d spx +4.64% +4.81% [+4.76%, +4.87%] 0.005
252d msci +4.67% +4.76% [+4.71%, +4.82%] 0.005
252d spxew +4.44% +4.46% [+4.40%, +4.52%] 0.264

Example triggers on US large-caps (2023+, mcap ≥ $30B)

Six recent bearish CCI triggers on US mega-caps. Top three: the signal's best outcomes. Bottom three: the worst. Catalyst-driven outliers (|α| > 25%) excluded so what's left is the signal's own typical good and bad days, not earnings shocks.

Strongest outcomes (what CCI looks like when it works)
Weakest outcomes (what CCI looks like when it fails)
Stock-regime quadrants (2×2 per-stock, 20d alpha detail table)
Each quadrant groups triggers by the stock's own ADX(14) and RV(20) at the trigger date — the textbook conditioning variable (not market-level). Stock %, bench %, alpha %, and HAC p-value shown for each benchmark.
Quadrant N Stock % (spx) Bench % (spx) Alpha % (spx) p (HAC) Stock % (msci) Bench % (msci) Alpha % (msci) p (HAC) Stock % (spxew) Bench % (spxew) Alpha % (spxew) p (HAC)
Trending + Low vol Clean directional grind, low whipsaw 174,695 +0.50% +0.72% -0.20% <0.001 +0.50% +0.57% -0.05% 0.0139 +0.50% +0.41% +0.12% <0.001
Trending + High vol Crisis selloff or parabolic rally 822,005 +1.06% +0.96% +0.15% <0.001 +1.06% +0.83% +0.28% <0.001 +1.06% +0.73% +0.40% <0.001
Non-trending + Low vol Quiet chop, summer doldrums 253,820 +0.48% +0.78% -0.27% <0.001 +0.48% +0.64% -0.13% <0.001 +0.48% +0.53% -0.01% 0.4378
Non-trending + High vol Classical "whipsaw zone" for momentum 805,246 +0.84% +0.99% -0.12% <0.001 +0.84% +0.92% -0.04% 0.0369 +0.84% +0.88% -0.01% 0.5512
Sub-period breakdown table (20d alpha)
Historical clustering check. If alpha concentrates in one era, the signal's robustness is questionable.
Period N Alpha % (spx) p (HAC) Alpha % (msci) p (HAC) Alpha % (spxew) p (HAC)
2015-2019 2015-01-01 → 2020-01-01 623,605 -0.56% <0.001 -0.36% <0.001 -0.32% <0.001
2020-2022 2020-01-01 → 2023-01-01 607,741 +0.38% <0.001 +0.48% <0.001 +0.13% <0.001
2023-2026 2023-01-01 → 2099-01-01 823,869 +0.03% 0.1666 +0.09% <0.001 +0.54% <0.001

Methodology and caveats

How to read. Entry at open of T+1 (one trading day after the signal fires on close of T). 20d = open T+1 to close T+20. Alpha = stock return − benchmark return over the same window (Convention A, single-sided, textbook). For bullish triggers, POSITIVE alpha = signal was right. For bearish triggers, NEGATIVE alpha = signal was right (stock underperformed market). No sign-flipping; the direction of the bet determines what "good" looks like. Per-stock regime is each stock's own ADX(14) and RV(20) at the trigger date — not market-wide state.

Three p-values, three robustness tests. (a) p_naive: scipy one-sample t-test on winsorized alphas. Optimistic because overlapping 20d windows on the same ticker inflate effective N. (b) p_hac: Newey-West HAC with lag = horizon — corrects for the overlap and is the academic-finance standard. (c) p_perm: fraction of 200 random-date null iterations with mean ≥ observed. Tests whether the signal beats random date selection at all. A signal that clears all three (pnaive, phac, pperm all < 0.05) has real information; a signal that fails pperm has zero edge even if the t-test says "significant."

Caveats. (i) Universe reflects today's active tickers; delisted losers pruned → survivorship bias. (ii) Mcap ≥ $100M filter uses today's snapshot, not point-in-time — mild lookahead on which stocks enter the sample, not on returns. (iii) Means and p-values use winsorized alphas (1/99 percentile) to prevent data errors from dominating. Medians and hit rates use raw data. (iv) Zero transaction costs assumed. Realistic bid-ask + commissions remove 20–40bps from 20d alpha on US large-caps, more on small-cap. Sub-20bps alpha is noise in practice. (v) Past performance does not predict future results.

How to use this

1 · When to reach for this signal

Caution recommended. Bullish 20d alpha is -0.34% and worse than random — triggering on random dates would have produced better long-side returns. Bearish 20d alpha is -0.05% and worse than random . Either direction fails the "beats random" test. Don't use Commodity Channel Index as a standalone entry trigger. It may still be useful as part of a composite (section 4).

2 · When it works — the setups that drive it

  • Best bullish setup: Trending + High vol — alpha -0.02% / 20d on 650,882 historical triggers.
  • Best bearish setup: Trending + High vol — alpha +0.15% / 20d on 822,005 historical triggers.
  • Best era for bullish: 2020-2022 — alpha -0.08% / 20d.
  • Best era for bearish: 2020-2022 — alpha +0.38% / 20d.

3 · When it fails — common false positives

  • Weakest bullish cell: Trending + Low vol — alpha -0.75% / 20d on 141,103 triggers.
  • Weakest bearish cell: Non-trending + Low vol — alpha -0.27% / 20d on 253,820 triggers.
  • Worst era for bullish: 2015-2019 — alpha -0.47% / 20d.
  • Worst era for bearish: 2015-2019 — alpha -0.56% / 20d.

Signal-specific failure patterns

Bullish fails every horizon, every benchmark
CCI bullish (indicator crossing back above ±100) produces α=−0.11 at 20d (p(HAC)<0.001, p_perm=1.000) and widens to −0.25 at 60d. Like other mean-reversion oscillators, CCI's 'oversold rebound' thesis doesn't survive a concentrated bull market where beaten-down names stay beaten down.
evidence: bullish vs SPX: 20d α=−0.11 p_perm=1.000; 60d α=−0.25 p_perm=1.000
Bullish was positive 2015-2019, broke post-COVID
Sub-period breakdown: 2015-2019 α=+0.11 (small positive), 2020-2022 α=−0.07, 2023-2026 α=−0.32. Same pattern as RSI/Bollinger: mean-reversion worked when rates were low and dispersion was high; it failed when stimulus-driven concentration took over.
evidence: 20d bullish vs SPX: 2015-19 +0.11, 2020-22 −0.07, 2023-26 −0.32
Bearish has real short-side edge that compounds
CCI bearish (crossing back below +100 overbought) delivers α=−0.17 at 20d (p(HAC)<1e-9, p_perm=0.005) and −0.48 at 60d. Real, persistent alpha — overbought stocks that exit the overbought zone tend to underperform the broader market for 1-3 months. Consistent across 2015-2019 and 2023-2026 (both ~−0.35); 2020-2022 reverses positive (+0.22, the QE anomaly).
evidence: bearish vs SPX: 20d α=−0.17 p_perm=0.005; 60d α=−0.48 p_perm=0.005

4 · Pairing inside a screen

The statements below describe how this signal relates to others by construction — which indicator family it belongs to, and where same-family redundancy might reduce the independence of evidence inside a Daily Report. These are taxonomic classifications drawn from standard technical-analysis texts; they are not pairing backtests. A multi-signal convergence backtest is planned but not yet run.

Oscillator-family redundancy

CCI belongs to the momentum-oscillator family alongside RSI, Stochastics, and Williams %R — each is constructed from closing price over a short lookback, normalised to a bounded range (Murphy, Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets, 1999; Pring, Technical Analysis Explained, 5th ed. 2014; Kirkpatrick & Dahlquist, Technical Analysis, 3rd ed. 2015). Stacking two or more of these in the same direction within a single Daily Report produces correlated rather than independent evidence.

What would likely rescue this signal

This block calls out the data or conditions that could turn a technically weak signal into a usable one in a composite screen. Based on signal mechanics and the observed failure patterns above; individual combinations are not yet backtested.

  • Regime-gate bullish on breadthBullish CCI worked pre-2020 when market breadth was wider. Gating bullish signals to 'SPX <5% from ATH = FALSE' or 'breadth > 55%' may restore the pre-QE alpha. Testable.
  • Extend bearish holdsBearish CCI compounds 20d → 60d (−0.17 → −0.48). Tight stops cut off the alpha. Time stops (hold 60d absent structural invalidation) capture more.

See also Why technical-only signals don't survive on their own for the broader argument.

5 · Before you act — a 5-point checklist

  1. Normal trading day? Rule out earnings (within ±3 days), ex-dividend, or known corporate-action dates — the signal is almost certainly reading noise, not momentum, in those windows.
  2. Where is price vs its own 50 / 200 DMA? A mean-reversion signal firing against the long-term trend (e.g. oversold in a clean uptrend) is much more reliable than one firing with it.
  3. What's the sector breadth doing? An isolated signal in a broadly down-trending sector is a lower-confidence setup than one firing with the rest of its peer group.
  4. Is ADV20 enough for your size? If the trigger is on a $500M name and you want to move $1M notional, you're the tape. Consider adv20d ≥ 5% of your intended position.
  5. What invalidates you? Define a price level (for longs: a close below the trigger-day low; for shorts: close above the trigger-day high) and honor it. The backtest alpha is an average; any one trade can be at either tail.

Execution notes

Bearish is the tradable side. 20d and 60d both significant; 60d compounds. Entry open T+1. Bullish CCI is a structural loser on US large-caps 2015-2026 — skip unless paired with structural/fundamental rescue filters.